Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.42 seconds)Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Delimitation Act, 1972
Jagdish Prasad And Others vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 25 March, 1992
In Kunju @ Balachandran vs. State of Tamil Nadu, AIR 2008 SC 1381 a similar view has been taken placing reliance on earlier judgments including Jagdish Prasad vs. State of M.P., AIR 1994 SC 1251; and Vadivelu Thevar vs. State of Madras, AIR 1957 SC 614.
Vadivelu Thevar vs The State Of Madras(With Connected ... on 12 April, 1957
In Kunju @ Balachandran vs. State of Tamil Nadu, AIR 2008 SC 1381 a similar view has been taken placing reliance on earlier judgments including Jagdish Prasad vs. State of M.P., AIR 1994 SC 1251; and Vadivelu Thevar vs. State of Madras, AIR 1957 SC 614.
State Of Haryana vs Inder Singh And Ors. on 29 January, 2002
In State of Haryana v. Inder Singh and Ors. reported in (2002) 9 SCC 537, Court held that it is not the quantity but the quality of the witnesses which matters for determining the guilt or innocence of the accused. The testimony of a sole witness must be confidence-inspiring and beyond suspicion, thus, leaving no doubt in the mind of the Court.
Bhagwan Singh & Ors vs State Of M.P on 22 March, 2002
In Bhagwan Singh & Others v. State of M.P., (2002) 4 SCC 85, Court repeated one of the fundamental principles of criminal jurisprudence that if two views are possible on the evidence adduced in the case, one pointing to the guilt of the accused and the other to his innocence, the view which is favourable to the accused should be adopted. Court observed as under:-
Bihar State Govt.Sec.Scl.Teachers ... vs Ashok Kumar Sinha & Ors on 7 May, 2014
1. This jail appeal under Section 383 Cr.P.C. has been filed by accused-appellant Ashok through Superintendent of District Jail, Ghaziabad against judgment and order dated 13.07.2011 passed by Sri Mohammad Ibrahim, Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No. 05, Gautambudh Nagar in Session Trial No. 441 of 2010, (State versus Ashok), Crime No.450 of 2010, Police Station Kasna, District Gautam Budh Nagar, under Section 302 IPC. By the impugned judgment accused-appellant has been convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment with a fine of Rs.5000/-. In the event of default in payment of fine, he has to undergo further six months imprisonment.
Kali Ram vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 24 September, 1973
In Kali Ram v. State of Himachal Pradesh, 1973 AIR 2773, Court made following observations: