Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.19 seconds)Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
R. Chandevarappa Etc. Etc vs State Of Karnataka & Ors. Etc. Etc on 8 September, 1995
549, Chandevarappa v. State of Karnataka . According to the learned Government Advocate, any alienation by the assignee Adi Dravidars is also violates the Constitutional objectives. In , the Apex Court considered as to whether the alienation of Government Lands allotted to the Scheduled Castes are in violation of the Constitutional objectives under Articles 39(b) and 46. On the facts of these cases, the Apex Court held that economic empowerment to Adi Dravidars and the power as a part of distributive justice is a fundamental right and the alienation is void under Section 23 of the Contract Act being violative of the constitutional scheme of economic empowerment to accord equality of status, dignity of persons and economic empowerment.
Murlidhar Dayandeo Kesekar vs Vishwanath Pandu Barde & Anr on 22 February, 1995
20. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the contesting respondents relied upon the recent pronouncement of the Supreme Court reported in Charan Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors. and also earlier judgment of the Apex Court reported in Murlidhar Dayanadee Kasemar v. Viswanatha Pandu Garde 1995 S.C.C. (Supp.)
Charan Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab on 26 July, 1974
20. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the contesting respondents relied upon the recent pronouncement of the Supreme Court reported in Charan Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors. and also earlier judgment of the Apex Court reported in Murlidhar Dayanadee Kasemar v. Viswanatha Pandu Garde 1995 S.C.C. (Supp.)
Article 46 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 23 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
1