Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.02 seconds)
Smt. Shashi Chopra vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation on 22 July, 2015 cites

Nand Kishore vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi And Ors. on 9 August, 1968

In the case of Nand Kishore Vs. MCD, (1969) DLT 214, it was held by a Division Bench of High Court of Delhi that the Corporation having first decided to demolish whole of the building and had given effect to the decision for 5/6th of it, it could not later change its mind and order repairs only to the remaining 1/6th. The same remarks would meet the arguments that some good portions of the ground floor should be preserved. Also the fact that the building has not fallen down till now does not mean that the opinion formed by the Commissioner was not based on existence of grounds or circumstances. Correctness of the opinion is not to be canvassed before the Civil Court.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 8 - I D Dua - Full Document

Municial Corporation Of Delhi vs Ramesh Chander And Anr. on 22 August, 1979

In the backdrop of the elicited provisions of Section 348 and 349 of DMC Act and law laid down in respect of these provisions in the cases of Daulat Ram (supra) and Ramesh Chander (supra), I find the elicited grounds of appeal not holding any merit to set aside the impugned order of the Trial Court or to restrain Respondent Corporation for implementation of its referred orders dated 17.10.2014 under Section 348 and 349 of DMC Act or to restrain the Respondent Corporation from demolition of the suit property. Consequently, appeal is found lacking merits and being not maintainable is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 13 - Full Document

Municipal Corporation Of Delhi vs Daulat Ram (Died) Represented By Lrs. on 30 April, 1971

In the case of Daulat Ram (supra) also had been held that the question as to whether the disputed building needed demolition was to be judged by the Corporation and civil courts had no jurisdiction to sit in judgment on the act done or purported to be done by Corporation in exercise of its statutory power. In the course of arguments counsel for Respondent Corporation assisted by the ALO of Respondent Corporation informed that floors upper than ground floor of the property in question stand already demolished. Opinion formed by Respondent Corporation that building in question was in dangerous condition and should be demolished was formed about whole of the building.
Delhi High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 42 - Full Document
1