Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.22 seconds)
Anil Kumar @Toni vs State And Anr on 27 August, 2024 cites

I.C.D.S. Ltd vs Beena Shabeer & Anr on 12 August, 2002

"It is also relevant to mention that the accused has only denied his capacity of a guarantor of the borrower i.e. Sh. Sandeep in the present case. It is not the defence of the accused that the liability of offence u/s 138 NI Act cannot be fastened upon a guarantor. Even otherwise, it is trite that the guarantor of the offence punishable u/s 138 NI Act. Reliance is placed upon I.C.D.S. Ltd. Vs. Been Shabeer & Anr. [(2002) 6 SCC 426] M/s The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Vs. Abhishek Mittal [2011 SCC Online Del 2444] and vijender Singh Vs. M/s Eicher Motors Limited & Anr [2011 SCC Online Del 2095]."
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 199 - U C Banerjee - Full Document

M/S The Jammu & Kashmir Bank vs Abhishek Mittal on 26 May, 2011

"It is also relevant to mention that the accused has only denied his capacity of a guarantor of the borrower i.e. Sh. Sandeep in the present case. It is not the defence of the accused that the liability of offence u/s 138 NI Act cannot be fastened upon a guarantor. Even otherwise, it is trite that the guarantor of the offence punishable u/s 138 NI Act. Reliance is placed upon I.C.D.S. Ltd. Vs. Been Shabeer & Anr. [(2002) 6 SCC 426] M/s The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Vs. Abhishek Mittal [2011 SCC Online Del 2444] and vijender Singh Vs. M/s Eicher Motors Limited & Anr [2011 SCC Online Del 2095]."
Delhi High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 330 - A K Pathak - Full Document
1   2 Next