Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 22 (0.67 seconds)
Shri. Salim Naim Khan And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 11 April, 2023 cites

Municipal Council, Ahmednagar And Anr vs Shah Hyder Beig And Ors on 8 December, 1999

59. The Supreme Court in the said judgment of Municipal Council Ahmednagar and Anr. (Supra) also adverted to the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. Industrial Development Investment Co. (P) Ltd. [(1996) 11 SCC 501] in which it has been held that when there is inordinate delay in filing the Writ Petition and when all steps taken in the acquisition proceedings, have become final, the Court should be loath to quash the notifications. The High Court has, no doubt, discretionary powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to quash the notification under Section 4(1) and declaration under Section 6, but it should be exercised taking all relevant factors into pragmatic consideration. When the award was passed and possession was taken, the Court should not have exercised its power to quash the award which is a material factor to be taken into consideration before exercising the power under Article 226.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 521 - Full Document

Lakhichand Marotrao Dhoble And Another vs Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur And ... on 3 November, 2020

Insofar as the judgment of this Court of Nagpur Bench in case of Lakhichand M. Dhoble & Anr. Vs. Joint Charity Commissioner and Anr.[2020(6) Bom C.R. 414] relied upon by Ms. Karnik, learned counsel for the Petitioners in Writ Petition No. 9712/2016 is concerned, the said judgment would not advance the case of the Petitioners over the issue of maintainability of the petition against the trust. The Petitioners have not demonstrated as to whether Respondent No.4 Trust has received any financial assistance from the State Government.
Bombay High Court Cites 24 - Cited by 2 - A S Chandurkar - Full Document
1   2 3 Next