Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.33 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 182 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 201 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 106 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Nandlal vs The State Of Maharashtra on 15 March, 2019
22. The facts of the case are clear that the appellant Tinku Singh at the
instance of the appellant Shashi Bala caused death of the deceased
and the causing of harm to the deceased did not stop there, who went
on to brutally behead the body of the deceased. Keeping in view the
manner in which the appellant Tinku Singh acted at the instance of
the appellant Shashi Bala, we are of the view that the present case
fails to fulfill the requisites as enunciated in Nandlal (Supra) in order
to give the benefit of exception 4 of Section 300 of the IPC.
Sridhar Bhuyan vs State Of Orissa on 9 August, 2004
14. Even if the fight is unpremeditated and sudden, if the
weapon or manner of retaliation is disproportionate to
the offence and if the accused had taken undue advantage
of the deceased, the accused cannot be protected under
Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC. Considering the scope of
Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, in Sridhar Bhuyan v.
State of Orissa (2004) 11 SCC 395 , this Court held as
under: (SCC pp. 396-97, paras 7-8)