Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)

Vimla Devi Khemka And Ors. vs General Manager, Madhya Pradesh State ... on 13 November, 1995

In so far as whether the accident had occurred on account of the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the truck is concerned, the MACT relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court reported in II(2009) ACC page 444 (SC) in the matter of Vimala Devi and others Vs. H.P.S.R.T.C. And others, wherein the Apex Court has held that strict proof of accident caused by BGP. 5 of 13 ::: Uploaded on - 28/06/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 30/07/2016 06:29:30 ::: (901)-FA-1283-14.doc particular bus in particular manner may not be possible to be done by claimant but the claimants are merely to establish their case on touchstone of preponderance of probabilities.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 56 - R Gupta - Full Document

Smt. Rajesh And Others vs Rajbir Singh And Others on 29 January, 2010

In so far as the last contention of the Learned Counsel Mr. D. S. Joshi that Awarding Rs.1,00,000/- each for loss of consortium and also loss of love and affection, in my view, the said contention cannot be accepted in the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in Rajesh's case (supra). In the said case also the deceased were in the age group of 30 to 35 and the Apex Court therefore deemed it appropriate to grant Rs.1,00,000/- on account of loss BGP. 12 of 13 ::: Uploaded on - 28/06/2016 ::: Downloaded on - 30/07/2016 06:29:31 ::: (901)-FA-1283-14.doc of consortium as also for the loss of love and affection . The award of the said amounts therefore cannot be said to be exorbitant or excessive.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 5161 - R Bindal - Full Document
1