Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 27 (0.22 seconds)

Vasudevan vs State Of Karnataka on 21 January, 2022

(2018) 1 SCC (Civ) 356: AIR 2017 SC 4084) it is an exhaustive code on the subject-matter of insolvency in relation to corporate entities and others. It is also true that the IBC, 2016 is a single Unified Umbrella Code, covering the entire gamut of the law relating to insolvency resolution of corporate persons and others in a time-bound manner. The Code provides a three-tier mechanism, namely, (i) the NCLT, which is the adjudicating authority, (ii) the NCLAT, which is the appellate authority, and (iii) this Court as the final authority, for dealing with all issues that may arise in relation to the reorganisation and insolvency resolution of corporate persons. Insofar as insolvency resolution of corporate debtors and personal guarantors are concerned, any order passed by the NCLT is appealable to NCLAT under Section 61 of the IBC, 2016 and the orders of the NCLAT are amenable to the appellate jurisdiction of this Court under Section 62. It is in this context that the action of the State of Karnataka in bypassing the remedy of appeal to NCLAT and the act of the High Court in entertaining the writ petition against the order (Vasudevan v. State of Karnataka, 2019 SCC OnLine NCLT
Karnataka High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next