Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.76 seconds)

Dr Ravikumar vs Mrs K M C Vasantha on 27 November, 2017

8. Consequently, this petition is allowed. The order dated 12.11.2019 passed by the XXIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, in C.C.No.27444/2019, rejecting the 'B' report and taking cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 420, 506 read with Section 34 of IPC is set aside. The case is remitted back to the learned Magistrate to strictly consider the protest petition in accordance with the judgment of the Coordinate Bench of this Court in Dr. Ravikumar vs. Mrs. K.M.C. Vasantha and another [ILR 2018 KAR 1725].
Karnataka High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 72 - K N Phaneendra - Full Document

Kamlapati Trivedi vs State Of West Bengal on 13 December, 1978

i) The court after going through the contents of the investigating papers, filed u/s 173 of Cr.P.C., is of the opinion that the investigation has not been done properly, the court has no jurisdiction to direct the Police to file the charge sheet however, the Court may direct the Police for re or further investigation and submit a report, which power is inherent under section 156(3) of Cr.P.C, but before taking cognizance such exercise has to be done. This my view is supported by the decisions of the Hon'ble Apex Court in a decision reported in between ABHINANDAN JHA vs DINESH MISHRA [AIR 1968 S.C. 117] (para 15) and also Full Bench decision of Apex Court reported in between KAMALAPATI TRIVEDI vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL [(1980) SCC 91] (second head note.) -7- NC: 2026:KHC:20451 CRL.P No. 5300 of 2021 HC-KAR
Supreme Court of India Cites 58 - Cited by 139 - P S Kailasam - Full Document
1   2 Next