Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.41 seconds)

Sathyam Educational & Charitable Trust ... vs Ito , Nfac , Delhi, - on 6 April, 2023

5. We have heard the parties, and perused the material available on record. The assessee during the year under consideration claimed exemption u/s. 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act. The A.O denied the said exemption on the ground that the assessee has not incurred any expenditure towards educational purpose during the year under consideration and that the total receipts of the assessee exceeds Rs.1 Crore. In this regard, we notice that the A.O has included a sum of Rs.20,50,000/- received by the assessee as contribution from the trustees and that without including the said contribution the receipts in the hands of the assessee for the year under consideration is less than Rs.1 Crore. We further notice that the Coordinate Bench in the case of M/s. Sathyam Educational and Charitable Trust (supra) has considered the issue of whether corpus donations should be included for the purpose of exemption u/s. 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act, and held that:
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chennai Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Acit(Exemption), Jaipur vs Mahima Shiksha Samiti, Jaipur on 3 March, 2017

16. The judgement in the case of Shiksha Samiti (supra) relied upon by the assesseeis absolutely relevant for the present case, wherein, the assessee's society has corpus receipt of Rs.39,14,102/- and the other receipts of Rs.60,24,857/-,wherein, the AO has wrongly aggregated these two receipts of the society and inferred that the annual receipts of the assessee society have exceeded Rs.1 Cr., therefore, exemption u/s.10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act, cannot be allowed. The addition was made by the AO, however, the same was deleted by the Ld.CIT(A) and the ITAT has also upheld the decision of the Ld CIT(A), held that the amount contributed voluntarily by the donors with specific direction that it will form part of corpus, would not constitute income of the society. Therefore, the annual receipts of educational institutions for the purpose of section 10(23C)(iiiad) were below Rs.1 Cr. and as such exemption u/s.10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act, was allowable.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Jaipur Cites 85 - Cited by 11 - Full Document

Income-Tax Officer,, vs Serum Institute Of India Research ... on 29 January, 2018

10. On the basis of principle of law laid down in the aforesaid judgments, it was the prayer of the assessee that since aggregate annual receipt of the school was below Rs.1 Cr., the AO has taken a stand against the provisions and intent of law and facts of the case which was further unjustifiably affirmed by the Ld CIT(A), therefore, it was the prayer of the Ld AR that the order of the Ld.CIT(A) is liable to be quashed and the exemption u/s.10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act deserves to be restored /allowed to the assessee.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Panji Cites 45 - Cited by 6 - Full Document
1   2 Next