Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.22 seconds)The Scheduled Tribes And Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition Of Forest Rights) Act, 2006
1. Conservation Action Trust Rep By Its ... vs Moef on 3 April, 2023
28. Putting it differently, the cause of action for
filing WPA (P) 16 of 2025 and WPA (P) 17 of 2025
are two different notifications relating to two
different National Parks. The legal questions may
16
be similar but cause of action and impugned
orders are different and distinct. Thus, we find
substantial face in the argument of learned
counsel for the petitioner that these petitions
cannot be thrown to the wind on the touchstone of
the Order 2 Rule 2 CPC. Apart from this, learned
ASG placed reliance on an order of National Green
Tribunal in the case of Ashish Kothari vs. MOEF
& CC Ors. reported in MANU/GT/0023/2026 as
decided by the National Green Tribunal, Eastern
Zone Branch, Kolkata.
The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
People'S Union For Democratic Rights ... vs Union Of India & Others on 18 September, 1982
10. A minute reading of the above paragraphs
makes it clear that there is no thumb rule
regarding the aspect of "locus standi". The Court
in so many words made it clear that it would not
be expedient to lay down any general rule which
would govern all cases under all circumstances.
Pertinently, in (1982) 3 SCC 235 (People's Union
for Democratic Rights & Ors. vs. Union of India
& Ors.) it was held that:
State Of Uttaranchal vs Balwant Singh Chaufal & Ors on 18 January, 2010
(Emphasis Supplied)
Likewise, in (2010) 3 SCC 402 (State of
Uttaranchal vs. Balwant Singh Chaufal & Ors.)
the Apex Court opined that:
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Padmausundara Rao (Dead) &Ors vs State Of T.N. & Ors on 13 March, 2002
By placing reliance on
4
Padmausundara Rao (Dead) &Ors vs State Of
T.N. &Ors. [2002 (3) SCC 533], it is urged that
one different fact may change the precedential
value of the judgment.
Janata Dal vs H.S. Chowdhary And Ors. on 28 August, 1992
In Janata Dal Vs. H.S. Chowdhary and
Ors. [1992 (4) SCC 305] the apex Court opined as
under:
1