Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.22 seconds)

1. Conservation Action Trust Rep By Its ... vs Moef on 3 April, 2023

28. Putting it differently, the cause of action for filing WPA (P) 16 of 2025 and WPA (P) 17 of 2025 are two different notifications relating to two different National Parks. The legal questions may 16 be similar but cause of action and impugned orders are different and distinct. Thus, we find substantial face in the argument of learned counsel for the petitioner that these petitions cannot be thrown to the wind on the touchstone of the Order 2 Rule 2 CPC. Apart from this, learned ASG placed reliance on an order of National Green Tribunal in the case of Ashish Kothari vs. MOEF & CC Ors. reported in MANU/GT/0023/2026 as decided by the National Green Tribunal, Eastern Zone Branch, Kolkata.
National Green Tribunal Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - A K Goel - Full Document

People'S Union For Democratic Rights ... vs Union Of India & Others on 18 September, 1982

10. A minute reading of the above paragraphs makes it clear that there is no thumb rule regarding the aspect of "locus standi". The Court in so many words made it clear that it would not be expedient to lay down any general rule which would govern all cases under all circumstances. Pertinently, in (1982) 3 SCC 235 (People's Union for Democratic Rights & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors.) it was held that:
Supreme Court of India Cites 31 - Cited by 436 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document
1