Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.71 seconds)Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Krishena Kumar And Anr. Etc. Etc vs Union Of India And Ors on 13 July, 1990
15. It is also argued that the Secretary (DEA-IES Cadre) illegally
reopened and altered the applicant's subordinate service seniority
date which had attained finality, in violation of the doctrine of res
judicata and stare decisis, as expounded by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in Krishna Kumar vs Union of India (1990) 4 SCC 207.
Satyadhyan Ghosal And Others vs Sm. Deorajin Debi And Another on 20 April, 1960
48. It is submitted that the Secretary (DEA-IES Cadre) has
knowingly falsified his own affidavit filed before the Hon'ble Court
and has unlawfully interfered with the binding judgment, in violation
of the doctrines of res judicata and stare decisis, while preparing the
impugned Final Seniority List dated 12.03.2025. The alteration of the
applicant's court-settled service seniority date from 13.04.1994 to
17.02.1997 and the consequent shifting of his IES induction date
from 01.01.2001 to 01.10.2013 is unsupported by any lawful
reasoning. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satyadhan Ghosal vs
Deorajin Debi (AIR 1960 SC 941) has categorically held that once a
matter is finally decided by a competent court, it cannot be reopened
in subsequent proceedings.
V.K.K. Nadimpalli vs Union Of India on 12 October, 2018
GOSA 10:05:02
IN +05'30'
3
principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and DoPT OMs
dated 07.02.1986 and 03.07.1986. The applicant claims reciprocal
legal benefits during his subsequent induction into the IES cadre
under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
U.P.State Road Transport Corporation vs Km. Kaushal Sharma on 4 December, 2019
13. It is submitted that once a judgment has attained finality, it
cannot be indirectly nullified by executive action, as held by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in CP (C) No. 248/2007 and reiterated in CA
No. 2320/2021 (State of UP vs M.K. Sharma). The impugned Draft
Seniority List dated 27.02.2024 is therefore void ab initio.
1