Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.47 seconds)M. Subramaniam vs S. Janaki on 20 March, 2020
5. This aspect was considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in
M.Subramaniam and another v. S.Janaki and another2.
Sakiri Vasu vs State Of U.P. And Others on 7 December, 2007
In the
said judgment, the Hon'ble Supreme Court affirmed the view taken
by the Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu v. State of Uttar Pradesh3
and Mohd. Yousuf v. Afaq Jahan4. The Hon'ble Supreme Court
noted the opinion expressed in Sakiri Vasu. In Sakiri Vasu, the
Supreme Court held as under:
Mohd. Yousuf vs Smt. Afaq Jahan & Anr on 2 January, 2006
In the
said judgment, the Hon'ble Supreme Court affirmed the view taken
by the Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu v. State of Uttar Pradesh3
and Mohd. Yousuf v. Afaq Jahan4. The Hon'ble Supreme Court
noted the opinion expressed in Sakiri Vasu. In Sakiri Vasu, the
Supreme Court held as under:
Govind Raju Sami vs The State Of Telangana on 8 March, 2019
4. The very issue was considered by this Court in
W.P.No.38397 of 2018 and batch in Govind Raju Sami v. State of
Telangana and Others1. On consideration of the precedent
decisions on the subject and the scope of provisions of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, more particularly, Sections 156, 190 and 200
of Cr.P.C., this Court held as under:
Section 190 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 200 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 156 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1