Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.29 seconds)The Societies Registration Act, 1860
Children Act, 1960
Section 25 in Children Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
Section 8 in The Societies Registration Act, 1860 [Entire Act]
Sheel Prakash Gupta vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of ... on 1 April, 2022
In the case of Sheet Gupta (supra), a Full Bench of this Court, while dealing with the provisions of Chapter VIII Rule 5 and a previous decision in Vajara Yojna Seed Farm, Kalyanpur (M/s) and others vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court II, U.P., Kanpur and another: 2003 (1) UPLBEC 496, has laid down that special appeal against an order passed by the writ Court arising out of an appellate order passed under paragraph 28 of the Essential Commodities Distribution Order, 2004 would not be maintainable. In the said case, statutory appeal was itself provided under paragraph 28 of the Distribution Order.
Mahendra Pratap Bhatt 76(Clmc)2015 vs Smt. Saroj Mahana on 25 April, 2016
In the case of Mahendra Pratap Bhatt (supra), special appeal had arisen out of an order passed by the learned Single Judge on an application under Section 24 C.P.C. and, having found that the learned Single Judge had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the application and pass order thereon, the special appeal was held maintainable and the order passed by the learned Single Judge was set aside.
Vajara Yojna Seed Farm And Ors. vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court Ii And ... on 21 November, 2002
In the case of Sheet Gupta (supra), a Full Bench of this Court, while dealing with the provisions of Chapter VIII Rule 5 and a previous decision in Vajara Yojna Seed Farm, Kalyanpur (M/s) and others vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court II, U.P., Kanpur and another: 2003 (1) UPLBEC 496, has laid down that special appeal against an order passed by the writ Court arising out of an appellate order passed under paragraph 28 of the Essential Commodities Distribution Order, 2004 would not be maintainable. In the said case, statutory appeal was itself provided under paragraph 28 of the Distribution Order.
Vijay Prakash D. Mehta & Anr vs Collector Of Customs (Preventive), ... on 16 August, 1988
The Full Bench took note of a judgment of Honble Supreme Court in Vijay Prakash D. Mehta and Jawahar D. Mehta vs. Collector of Customs (Preventive), Bombay : AIR 1988 SC 2010 wherein observation was made that right to appeal is neither an absolute right nor an ingredient of natural justice, the principles of which must be followed in all judicial and quasi-judicial adjudications and the right is a statutory right and it can be circumscribed by the conditions in the grant.
The United Commercial Bank Ltd vs Their Workmen(And Other Cases)Union Of ... on 9 April, 1951
29. We may observe here that mainly three kinds of jurisdiction are recognized under the law; pecuniary, territorial and inherent. If any Court/authority lacks any of such jurisdictions, the order passed by it would be a nullity. Further, jurisdiction cannot be conferred upon the Court/authority in any manner even based upon consent or acquiescence. Reference in this regard can be made to United Commercial Bank Limited vs. Their Workmen : AIR 1951 SC 230, Kiran Singh vs. Chaman Paswan : AIR 1954 SC 340, Benarsi Silk Palace vs. Commissioner of Income Tax : (1964) 52 ITR 220 (All), Kali Das Wadhwani & Another vs. Jagjiwan Das and another : 1985 (2) ARC 533, Sardar Hasan Siddique vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal : AIR 1986 Allahabad 132, Karnal Improvement Trust vs. Prakashwati : (1995) 5 SCC 159, U.P. Rajkiya Nirman Nigam Ltd. vs. Indudre Pvt. Ltd. : AIR 1996 SC 1373, S. Sethuraman vs. R. Venkataraman and others: AIR 2007 SC 2499, Collector, Distt.