Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (2.17 seconds)Section 100 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
M.K. Jain And Ors. vs State Transport Appellate Tribunal And ... on 4 April, 2003
Mr. Kalia, learned Senior Advocate also relied upon the judgment of this Court rendered in the case of of M.K.Jain (Supra) and submitted that in the light of the said decision on the diversion of route made in 1985 due to construction of pucca bridge at Dewal the route from Muzaffarnagar to Bijnore became notified route through Jansath-Meerapur-Bijnore which was diverted under the necessity since 1977 itself, therefore, in 1989 no permits to the private operators could have been granted by the Regional Transport Authority. The relevant portion of consideration made in paragraph 16 is reproduced hereinunder:-
Gold (Control) Act, 1968
U.P.State Road Transport Corporation ... vs Omaditya Verma & Ors on 5 April, 2005
Keeping in view the observations made hereinabove, I am of the view that the present case is distinguishable to Omaditya Verma's case (supra).
Section 68D in Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 [Entire Act]
Manzoor Ahmed Margray vs Gulam Hassan Aram & Ors on 5 October, 1999
However, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners' case does not cover under that very order as the petitioners were not party in the said writ petition , rather the petitioners relied upon the judgment in Manzoor Ahmed's case (Supra), the relevant para 15 is reproduced hereinunder:-