Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.94 seconds)Section 125 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Section 28 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
The Central Excise Act, 1944
The Union Of India vs Seahorse Hospitals Limited on 22 June, 2016
In addition to the above, learned counsel submitted that the judgment of this Court in the case of: Union of India Vs. Seahorse Hospitals Ltd., 2016 (338) E.L.T. 661 (Mad.), had no application to the instant appeal, as, on facts, the said judgment was distinguishable.
Section 112 in The Central Excise Act, 1944 [Entire Act]
M/S. Bharat Diagnostic Cetre vs Commissioner Of Customs on 31 July, 2014
When respondent no.2 has already granted certificates in favour of several such Diagnostic Centres, as alleged in the Special Leave Application, refusal on his part to grant such certificate to the appellant without any justifiable reason tantamounts to a discriminatory treatment meted out to the appellant which on the face of it is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. In view of our conclusion, as aforesaid, we have no doubt in our mind that the order of respondent no.2 refusing to grant certificate to the appellant is liable to be struck down and the High Court also committed serious error in rejecting the Writ Petition filed by the appellant. .....
13.2. The Supreme Court in Bharat Diagnostic Centre case affirmed this view, as indicated above. This aspect is discernible from the following observations made in paragraphs 15 and 16 of the said judgment. The said observations, for the sake of convenience, are also extracted hereafter :
Section 25 in The Customs Act, 1962 [Entire Act]
Section 111 in The Central Excise Act, 1944 [Entire Act]
Mediwell Hospital & Health Care Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India & Ors on 17 December, 1996
Therefore, we cannot take exception to the observations made in Mediwell's case (supra).