Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.24 seconds)Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Anr vs Union Of India And Ors on 10 September, 1980
It has been further argued that the fact of
bringing wine to the premises of the management has not been
proved at all. It has been further argued that no opportunity was
given by the enquiry officer to the workman to defend his case
and the entire enquiry proceeding have been conducted in
violation of the principles of natural justice. It has been further
argued that the enquiry report is perverse and against the
principles of natural justice. The workman has relied upon the
judgements titled as State of U.P. vs. Shatrughan Lal & Anr.
cited as AIR 1998 SUPREME COURT 3038; titled as Indian
Oil Corporation Ltd., Barauni vs. The Union of India cited as
2018 LLR 488 PATNA HIGH COURT; titled as Palwinder
Kaur & Ors. vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr.
cited as 2016 LLR 1 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA and titled
LIR No. 1647/16 Ram Singh Vs. Kangaroo India Pvt. Ltd. Page 7/20
as Vindyachal Security, Detective & Allied Services Pvt. Ltd.
vs. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner cited as 2016
LLR 2 BOMBAY HIGH COURT.
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs S.M.I. Kazim And Ors. on 17 January, 2001
20. The management has also relied upon the judgement titled
as New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs. S.M.I. Kazim & Ors.
cited as 2001 LLR 825 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA,
wherein, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has held :
State Bank Of India And Ors vs Narendra Kumar Pandey on 14 January, 2013
21. The management has also relied upon the judgement titled
as State Bank of India and Ors. vs. Narendra Kumar Pandey
cited as 2013 LLR 211 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA,
wherein, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has held :
Chairman-Cum-M.D.,Coal India Ld.& Ors vs Ananta Saha & Ors on 6 April, 2011
22. The management has also relied upon the judgement
titled as Chairman-cum-M.D., Coal India Ltd. and Ors. vs.
Ananta Saha & Ors. cited as 2011 LLR 673 SUPREME
COURT OF INDIA, wherein, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of
India has held :
Chairman & Md V.S.P. & Ors vs Goparaju Sri Prabhakara Hari Babu on 5 March, 2008
23. The management has also relied upon the judgement titled
LIR No. 1647/16 Ram Singh Vs. Kangaroo India Pvt. Ltd. Page 10/20
as Chairman and MD, V.S.P. & Ors. vs. Goparaju Sri
Prabhakara Hari Babu cited as 2008 LLR 715 SUPREME
COURT OF INDIA, wherein, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of
India has held :
Biecco Lawrie Ltd. & Anr vs State Of West Bengal & Anr on 28 July, 2009
24. The management has also relied upon the judgement titled
as Biecco Lawrie Ltd. & Anr. vs. State of West Bengal & Anr.
cited as 2009 LLR 1057 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA,
wherein, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India has held :
Section 10 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
State Of U.P vs Shatrughan Lal & Anr on 30 July, 1998
It has been further argued that the fact of
bringing wine to the premises of the management has not been
proved at all. It has been further argued that no opportunity was
given by the enquiry officer to the workman to defend his case
and the entire enquiry proceeding have been conducted in
violation of the principles of natural justice. It has been further
argued that the enquiry report is perverse and against the
principles of natural justice. The workman has relied upon the
judgements titled as State of U.P. vs. Shatrughan Lal & Anr.
cited as AIR 1998 SUPREME COURT 3038; titled as Indian
Oil Corporation Ltd., Barauni vs. The Union of India cited as
2018 LLR 488 PATNA HIGH COURT; titled as Palwinder
Kaur & Ors. vs. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr.
cited as 2016 LLR 1 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA and titled
LIR No. 1647/16 Ram Singh Vs. Kangaroo India Pvt. Ltd. Page 7/20
as Vindyachal Security, Detective & Allied Services Pvt. Ltd.
vs. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner cited as 2016
LLR 2 BOMBAY HIGH COURT.