Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.29 seconds)Sarju Pershad vs Raja Jwaleshwari Pratap Narain Singh ... on 14 November, 1950
Following passage from SARJU PERSHAD v. JWALESHWARI PRATAO NARAIN SINGH,
is quoted at page 1856:
Bega Begum And Ors vs Abdul Ahad Khan And Ors on 6 October, 1978
Earlier, Mst. BEGA BEGAUM AND ORS. v. ABDUL AHAD KHAN AND ORS., Supreme Court pointed out that the provisions of the Rent Control Act cannot be unduly stretched or strained so as to make it impossible or extremely difficult for the landlord to get a decree for eviction.
Dr. Gopal Dass Verma vs Dr. S. K. Bhardwaj And Another on 2 May, 1961
DR. GOPAL DAS VERMA v. DR. S.K. BHARDWAJ AND ANR., is based on the language of Section 13 of Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act wherein the landlord could evict the tenant from the premises let for residential purposes only and therefore it was not possible to seek eviction of the tenant from a non-residential premises,
Section 17 in Kerala University Act, 1974 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in Kerala University Act, 1974 [Entire Act]
Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001
Section 13 in Delhi and Ajmer Rent Control Act, 1952 [Entire Act]
Smt. Rajbir Kaur & Anr vs S. Chokesiri & Co on 9 August, 1988
9. I am fully aware of the principle that appreciation of oral evidence is primarily for the trial Court and even a first appellate Court shall not take a different view (vide: Smt. RAJBIR KAUR AND ANR. v. S. CHOKOSIRI & CO., In this regard the Supreme Court observed at page 1854:
The Delhi Rent Act, 1995
1