Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.25 seconds)Section 50 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 23 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 22 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Karnail Singh And Another vs The State Of Punjab on 9 January, 1953
In Karnail Singh Vs. State of Punjab 1983
Criminal Law Journal, 1218, a Division Bench of this Court,
Crl. Appeal No. 1386-SB of 2001
Roop Singh And Others vs The State Of Punjab on 28 August, 1973
In Roop Singh Vs. State of Punjab 1996 (1) RCR
146, a Division Bench of this Court, held that no adverse
inference can be drawn, when the only independent witness,
was given up by the prosecution, as won over by the accused.
It was further held, in the said authority, that the panch
witnesses, being human beings, are quite exposed and
vulnerable to human feelings of yielding, browbeating, threats
and inducements, and giving up of the public witnesses, as won
over, is fully justified, in the present day situation, prevailing in
the society.
Section 25 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Masalti vs State Of U. P on 4 May, 1964
In Masalti Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1965 (S.C.) 202, it
was held that it is, undoubtedly, the duty of the prosecution to
lay before the Court, all material witnesses, available to it,
whose evidence is necessary for unfolding its case, but it would
be unsound to lay down it, as a general rule, that every witness,
must be examined, even though his evidence, may not be very
material or, even if, it is known that he has been won over or
terrorized.
1