Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.20 seconds)
Rajendra Singh vs Tulsabai And Ors. on 19 December, 2002 cites

Life Insurance Corporation Of India vs Karthyani And Ors. on 31 March, 1975

11. Thus, the consistent view of this court has been that a private place to which public have a permissive access is also a public place. The Claims Tribunal has relied upon the decision of Orissa High Court in L.I.C. of India v. Karthyani, 1975 ACJ 226 (Orissa), which has not been followed by the same High Court subsequently. Similarly, the Claims Tribunal has relied upon the two decisions of Gujarat High Court and Madras High Court in Oriental Fire & Genl. Ins.
Orissa High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 19 - Full Document

Oriental Fire And General Insurance Co. ... vs Raghunath Muduli And Ors. on 10 December, 1990

In this case decision of Orissa High Court in Raghunath's case, 1992 ACJ 117 (Orissa), referred above was relied upon and it was held that mines area owned by the Central Coalfields, where entry is restricted but members of the public have access on permission, is a 'public place' and the insurer of the vehicle is liable for compensation on account of accident in that area.
Orissa High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 12 - G B Patnaik - Full Document

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Parvathi Devi And Ors. on 6 April, 1999

The Full Bench of the Madras High Court also in United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Parvathi Devi, 1999 ACJ 1520 (Madras), has held: "Public place under the Motor Vehicles Act will cover all places including those of private ownership where members of public have an access whether free or controlled in any manner whatsoever. The earlier decisions of that High Court must be held to have been overruled by this Full Bench decision.
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 34 - Full Document
1   2 Next