Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.40 seconds)
M/S.Indroyal Furniture Company (P) Ltd vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) on 21 April, 2016 cites

Britannia Industries Ltd vs The Deputy Commissioner (Ct)-Iii (Fac) on 1 March, 2016

In the decision cited on the side of the petitioner in 2016-TIOL-489-HC-MAD-VAT (Britannia Industries Ltd v. the Deputy Commissioner (CT)-III (FAC), Chennai-8), the issue involved was to reverse the Input Tax Credit along with the consequential imposition of penalty by the Assessing Officer and the same was ultimately decided in favour of the Assessee, following the earlier judgment reported in 2013 (60) VST 283 (Mad) (Sri Vinayaga Agencies v. the Assistant Commissioner (CT), Chennai and another). For better appreciation, the relevant paragraphs of the said decision are extracted hereunder:
Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - M Duraiswamy - Full Document

Sri Vinayaga Agencies vs The Assistant Commissioner (Ct) on 29 January, 2013

In view of the dictum laid down by this court, following the orders of this court, the writ petitions are allowed. Since the issue involved in the present writ petitions relates to the payment of VAT and imposition of penalty by the sellers, the writ petitioners are allowed only in so far as the issue involving the payment of VAT by the sellers. So far as the other issues are concerned, since the petitioner has got appeal remedy, it is open to the petitioner to file appeals as against the impugned orders. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed."
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 31 - R Sudhakar - Full Document
1