Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (1.89 seconds)
Basawaraj S/O Kashappa vs The Spl Land Acquisition Officer on 10 June, 2011 cites

State Of Haryana vs Chandra Mani & Ors on 30 January, 1996

"16... In dealing. with the application for condonation of delay" filed. om behalf of the State and its agehcies/insirumentalities this Court has, while emphasising that same yardstick should be applied for deciding the applications for condonation of delay filed by _-pfivate individuals and the State, observed that certain ~ amourit, of latitude is not impermissible in the latter case "because the State represents collective cause of the . community and the decisions are taken by the officers / agencies at a slow pace and encumbered process 3% py of pushing the files from table to tale consumes considerable time causing dealy - G. Ramegwoda V Land. Acquisition Officer, State of Haryana Vs Chandru Mani, State of UP v Harish Chandra, State of Bihar v Ratan Lal «.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 754 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors vs Harish Chandra Singh on 17 January, 1969

"16... In dealing. with the application for condonation of delay" filed. om behalf of the State and its agehcies/insirumentalities this Court has, while emphasising that same yardstick should be applied for deciding the applications for condonation of delay filed by _-pfivate individuals and the State, observed that certain ~ amourit, of latitude is not impermissible in the latter case "because the State represents collective cause of the . community and the decisions are taken by the officers / agencies at a slow pace and encumbered process 3% py of pushing the files from table to tale consumes considerable time causing dealy - G. Ramegwoda V Land. Acquisition Officer, State of Haryana Vs Chandru Mani, State of UP v Harish Chandra, State of Bihar v Ratan Lal «.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 221 - S M Sikri - Full Document

State Of Bihar vs Ratan Lal Sabu & Vs. Etc on 8 August, 1996

"16... In dealing. with the application for condonation of delay" filed. om behalf of the State and its agehcies/insirumentalities this Court has, while emphasising that same yardstick should be applied for deciding the applications for condonation of delay filed by _-pfivate individuals and the State, observed that certain ~ amourit, of latitude is not impermissible in the latter case "because the State represents collective cause of the . community and the decisions are taken by the officers / agencies at a slow pace and encumbered process 3% py of pushing the files from table to tale consumes considerable time causing dealy - G. Ramegwoda V Land. Acquisition Officer, State of Haryana Vs Chandru Mani, State of UP v Harish Chandra, State of Bihar v Ratan Lal «.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 104 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document
1