Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.16 seconds)Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Niranjan Prasad & Ors vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 March, 1996
In the case of Niranjan Prasad v. State of M.P. reported in 1996 (1) East Cr C 716 (SC), the Supreme Court noticed that the eye-witnesses stated that the deceased was assaulted with sharp cutting weapon, however, the evidence of the doctor who held post mortem examination shows that the deceased had no injury which could be caused by sharp cutting weapon; and, indeed, he had sustained only one injury which could be caused, according to the doctor, by a blunt weapon only. The Supreme Court held that if on the basis of the objective findings of the doctor, the trial Court found it unsafe to rely upon the ocular version of the incident as was given by the four witnesses in the said case, it cannot be said that the finding of the trial Court in this regard was against the weight of evidence or perverse.
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
1