Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.41 seconds)Section 11 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Section 6 in The Right to Information Act, 2005 [Entire Act]
Director Of Income Tax (Investigation) ... vs Bhagat Singh And Anr. on 17 December, 2007
The contention
that the decision in the case of Sudhirranjan Senapati (supra) and S.M.
Lamba v. S. C. Gupta and Ors.(supra) are per incurium is unmerited in
view of the authoritative decision by the Division Bench of this Court in
the case of Bhagat Singh & Anr (supra).
Cpio, Intelligence Bureau vs Sanjiv Chaturvedi on 23 August, 2017
21. Having stated the above, it is also necessary to observe that it was
readily conceded by Mr Sinha that the issue whether the information sought
is excluded from the purview of the RTI Act was squarely covered by the
decision of a Coordinate Bench of this Court in CPIO, Intelligence Bureau
v. Sanjiv Chaturvedi (supra). This Court concurs with the view expressed
in the said decision.
Satinder Pal Singh vs Union Of India And Ors. on 9 December, 1991
The decision of the Coordinate
Bench of this Court rendered in Surinder Pal Singh v. Union of India &
Ors (supra) is of little assistance or relevance in the light of the subsequent
decision rendered by the Division Bench in Bhagat Singh & Anr. (supra)
and the decisions of a Coordinate Bench of this Court rendered in Deputy
Commissioner of Police v. D.K. Sharma : W.P. (C) 12428/2009, decided
on 15.12.2010; B.S. Mathur v. Public Information Officer of Delhi High
Court : W.P. (C) 295/2011, decided on 03.06.2011; and Union of India v.
O.S. Nahar : W.P. (C) 3616/2012, decided on 22.04.2015.