Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.30 seconds)Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Sri Krishnavilas Bajanai Madam, Rep. By ... vs The Commissioner, H.R. And C.E. ... on 16 October, 2006
(iii) 2006(5) CTC 645 (Sri Krishnavilas Bajanai Madam v. The Commissioner, H.R. & C.E., Department, Madras and others), wherein, a Division Bench of this court held that in the absence of any material whatsoever indicating that pubic had right to participate in the worship or in the bajanai or offer any worship, a document creating a trust can be construed only as a private trust. The Division bench also held that in the absence of a member of public participating in the management or even had right to worship, then same can be construed only as private trust.
Section 63 in Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 [Entire Act]
Bihar State Board Religious Trust, ... vs Mahant Sri Biseshwar Das on 9 February, 1971
(v) AIR 1971 SC 2057 (The Bihar State Board of Religious Trust (Patna) v. Mahanth Sri. Bishwar Das), wherein it has been held as follows:
Madras Hindu Religious Endowments ... vs V.N. Deivanai Ammal By Power Of Attorney ... on 25 August, 1953
(vi) AIR 1954 MAD 482 (Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Board v. N.Deivanai Ammal), wherein, the Division Bench of this court held as follows:
G.Jayalakshmi And Ors vs Arulmighu Pazhikanchiya Vinayagar ... on 28 July, 2009
(i) 2009(16) SCC 409 (G.Jayalakshmi and others v. Arulmighu Pazkhikanchiya Vinayagar Trust and its temple), wherein the Hon'ble Apex court held that a temple may be declared as public temple inter alia when a grant is made in favour of the public by the owner of the property although the temple is constructed by a private person, or if the temple is constructed on Government land and if the public in general have a right to worship the deity as contra distinguished from the right of worship in a temple which is confined to a family on community.
The Commissioner, H.R. & C.E. (Admn. ... vs K. Nagarajaodayar on 1 November, 2002
(vii) 2003(1) MLJ 288 ( The Commissioner, H.R. & C.E. Department, Madras and others v. K.Nagarajaodayar), wherein, the Division Bench of this court held as follows:
1