Cit vs Ekl Appliances Ltd on 29 March, 2012
6. Being aggrieved, the appellant is before us in the present appeal.
It was contended on behalf of the appellant that for the purpose of
bench marking the intra group services, TPO was not justified in
examining the necessity as well as the profitability of such expenditure
ITA No. 1337/Bang/2010
Page 6 of 11
and reliance in this regard was placed on the decision of Hon'ble Delhi
High Court in the case of CIT Vs. EKL Appliances 345 ITR 241 and
the Coordinate Bench decision cited supra. The learned AR further
contended that the learned TPO is not justified in rejecting the TNMM
at entity level without demonstrating as to how some other method will
be more appropriate for the purpose of bench marking the ALP. He
also filed some additional evidence vide an application for admission
of additional evidence to demonstrate that the appellant actually
received the management services. The additional evidence was in the
form of email correspondence and EDP screenshot, etc.