Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.44 seconds)Section 31 in The State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
The State Financial Corporations Act, 1951
Southern Petrochemical Industries Co. ... vs Electricity Inspector And E.T.I.O. & ... on 15 May, 2007
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Karnataka State Financial Corporation vs N. Narasimahaiah & Ors on 13 March, 2008
13. We need not dilate on the interpretation of the aforementioned
provision as the same is now covered by a decision of this Court in
Karnataka State Financial Corporation v. N. Narasimahaiah and Ors. [2008
(4) SCALE 473] wherein it was held:
Section 32 in The State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Article 12 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
New India Assurance Company Ltd vs Nusli Neville Wadia And Another on 13 December, 2007
"26. While interpreting the provisions of a
statute, the court employs different principles or
canons. To interpret a statute in a reasonable
manner, the court must place itself in the chair of a
reasonable legislator/ author. [See New India
Assurance Company Ltd. v. Nusli Neville Wadia
and Anr. [JT 2008 (1) SC 31] Attempt on the part
of the court while interpreting the provisions of a
statute should, therefore, be to pose a question as
to why one provision has been amended and the
other was not? Why one terminology has been
used while inserting a statutory provision and a
different clause in another? It is well-known that
casus omissus cannot be supplied.