cites: 163593884

Ashok Kumar Pandey vs The State Of West Bengal on 18 November, 2003

26.11. 2013 rrc W. P. 33784 (W) of 2013 (Ashok Kumar Panda Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.) Mr. B. R. Neogi Mr. Angshumoy Guha ......For the petitioner Mr. Saugata Bhattacharya ......For the State Ms. Sampa Sarkar ......For the Distribution Company The petitioner is an employee of the West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (hereafter the 'Company').

Supreme Court of India Cites 26 - Cited by 902 - A Pasayat - Full Document

P.V. Mahadevan vs M.D. Tamil Nadu Housing Board on 8 August, 2005

Mr. Neogi, learned advocate representing the petitioner has relied on the decisions of the Supreme Court reported in 2005 (5) SLR 384 (P. V. Mahadevan Vs. M.D., Tamil Nadu Housing Board), (2012) 11 SCC 565 (Secretary, Ministry of Defence and others Vs. Prabhash

Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 781 - Full Document

The Secretary, Min.Of Defence & Ors vs Prabhash Chandra Mirdha on 30 April, 2007

Mr. Neogi, learned advocate representing the petitioner has relied on the decisions of the Supreme Court reported in 2005 (5) SLR 384 (P. V. Mahadevan Vs. M.D., Tamil Nadu Housing Board), (2012) 11 SCC 565 (Secretary, Ministry of Defence and others Vs. Prabhash

Supreme Court of India Cites 25 - Cited by 365 - Full Document

Anant R Kulkarni vs Y.P.Education Society & Ors on 26 April, 2013

Chandra Mirdha) and (2013) 6 SCC 515 (Anant R. Kulkarni Vs. Y. P. Education Society & Ors.) to contend that the delay in initiation of the disciplinary proceeding against the petitioner must be held to be a vitiating factor for which judicial interdiction is warranted.

Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 262 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

B.C. Chaturvedi vs Union Of India And Ors on 1 November, 1995

I am of the view that the cited decisions are clearly distinguishable and that it is the decision of the Supreme Court reported in (1995) 6 SCC 749 (B. C. Chaturvedi Vs. Union of India & Ors.) that provides a complete answer to the contention urged by Mr. Neogi. It would be profitable to extract paragraph - 11 of the said decision, reading as follows: -

Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 2256 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]

Constitution Article Cites 0 - Cited by 122106

The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973

Union of India - Act Cites 0 - Cited by 423370

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results