Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (1.70 seconds)Section 149 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 120B in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 147 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 27 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Pyara Singh Mulla vs State Of Punjab on 28 July, 1954
In this respect, Pyara Singh v. State of Punjab 1977 Cr.L.R. (SC) 466; State of UP v. Sughad Singh 1978 CAR 62 and Hukam Singh v. State of Rajasthan among others can be referred to. Thus, simply because these witnesses were closely related to deceased, their testimony can not be discarded.
Section 374 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Mehraj Singh vs State Of U.P on 21 April, 1994
28. The submissions of the learned Counsel were that the place of occurrence has been changed which affects the prosecution version adversely and no reliance can be placed upon it. According to learned Counsel, as per site plan map Ex.P-4 occurrence has not taken place at the well shown at place 'A' in the site plan but was scattered from place A to E, within a distance of about 100 yards. learned Counsel has relied upon decision of Apex Court in Mehraj Singh v. State of U.P. 1994 SC(Cr) 1390, wherein there was no blood stains at the place of occurrence nor were there blood trails from the occurrence to the place where dead body was found and in the circumstances, the Apex Court was of the view that the occurrence did not take place in the manner suggested by the prosecution and gensis of fight has been suppressed from the court.
Nihal Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 11 October, 1985
In Nihal Singh v. State of Rajasthan 1986 RLW 128, a Division Bench of our own High Court, in the facts and circumstances involved therein, was of the view that from the investigation, occurrence took place inside house of Nihal Singh whereas testimony of eye-witnesses shows occurrence to have taken place out of house of Pat Ram and the place of occurrence seems to have been changed, rendering prosecution story doubtful.