Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.24 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Bibi Aisha & Ors vs Bihar Subai Sunni Majlis Avaqaf & Ors on 24 July, 1968
6.The learned counsel for the petitioner also relied on the decision
of the Supreme Court reported in AIR 1969 SC 253 (Bibi Aisha v. Bihar
S.S.M.Avaqaf) and a judgment of a learned Judge of this Court reported in 2001
(3) CTC 34 (Rajathi vs. Arukkani Ammal). In the Supreme Court decision cited
Supra, their Lordships have held that when case falls under clause (a), any
secondary evidence (a plain copy of the document) and not necessarily certified
copy of document is admissible, though the case may also fall under clause (f).
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 63 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 74 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Rajathi vs Arukkani Ammal on 25 January, 2001
6.The learned counsel for the petitioner also relied on the decision
of the Supreme Court reported in AIR 1969 SC 253 (Bibi Aisha v. Bihar
S.S.M.Avaqaf) and a judgment of a learned Judge of this Court reported in 2001
(3) CTC 34 (Rajathi vs. Arukkani Ammal). In the Supreme Court decision cited
Supra, their Lordships have held that when case falls under clause (a), any
secondary evidence (a plain copy of the document) and not necessarily certified
copy of document is admissible, though the case may also fall under clause (f).
1