Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.20 seconds)Mohinder Kaur vs Sant Paul Singh on 1 October, 2019
13. The facts of the case on hand are entirely different from the
facts of the case in Mohinder Kaur's case (2nd cited supra), hence,
the said judgment does not aid the appellants in any manner.
Gurdev Kaur & Ors vs Kaki & Ors on 18 April, 2006
24. Further, in Gurdev Kaur v. Kaki 4, the Apex Court held that
the High Court sitting in Second Appeal cannot examine the
evidence once again as a third trial Court and the power under
Section 100 C.P.C. is very limited and it can be exercised only
where a substantial question of law is raised and fell for
consideration.
A.Thirumoorthy vs S.Bastin on 19 November, 2014
In A.Thirumoorhty's case (1st cited supra), there is a clear
interpolation and insertion of the number '4' in the year '2004' and
also corresponding alteration in the year in vernacular language.
Katta Nageswara Rao And Anr. vs Reddi Saraswathi And Ors. on 29 October, 1991
14. Further, there is no quarrel with regard to the ratio laid down
in Katta Nageswara Rao's case (3rd cited supra). It is apposite to
note that the first Appellate Court has framed four points for
consideration and answered the same duly considering the
evidence on record.
1