Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.24 seconds)
Centre vs Shruti Madhukar Panchal on 13 January, 2014 cites

Padmadevi Shankarrao Jadhav And Ors. vs Kabalising Garmilsing Sardarji And ... on 18 July, 1984

43. Mr. Mendon relied on the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in Padmadevi Shankarrao Jadhav v Kablasing Gormilsing Sardarji7 in response to our query regarding the suggestions made in the insurer's written arguments before the MACT. According to him, this decision is an authority for the proposition that compensation can never be granted wholly on the basis of the interest the lump sum will derive, as this is unscientific.
Bombay High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 14 - Full Document

Maharashtra State Road Transport ... vs Babalal Daud Mulani And Ors. on 6 November, 1984

An identical view was taken by the same Division Bench in Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v Babalal Daud Mulani.8 We are unable to accept Mr. Mendon's submissions. Padmadevi and Babalal Mulani are both decisions relating to claims that arose out of an accidental deaths. The submission before the court in those two cases was not that claimants needed ongoing treatment and would have to incur continuous expenses, or even that the claimants had need for an amount representing earnings, but only that in deciding the quantum of the lump-sum or capital amount to be awarded, regard must be had to the interest that capital amount would fetch.
Bombay High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 18 - Full Document
1