Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 51 (0.52 seconds)

State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Munna Choubey & Anr on 24 January, 2005

2. The prosecution case is that on 14.08.2007 on receipt of DD No. 29B, SI Joginder Singh along with Constable Tasveer went to the spot at D­130, Mangolpuri where SI Suresh Kumar and Constable Harphool were present with other persons. They found the dead body of one boy aged about 7/8 years in the veranda of the third floor with injuries on his neck, face, waist and other parts of the body. The dead body was identified by one Raju the father of the deceased boy who stated that accused Munna has killed his son. Without wasting time, SI Joginder Singh sent ASI Suresh along with Sonu to Sanjay Gandhi Hospital who was declared brought dead in the hospital. The statement of father of the victim namely Raju was recorded in which he stated that on 13.08.2007 at about 9.00 p.m in D Block park his son Sonu was playing and he was also present there. He asked his son to go to the State Vs. Munna 3 house but he replied that he would come to the house later on. But the child did not come to the house in the night so in the morning on 14.08.2007, he (Raju) went to trace his son Sonu.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 203 - A Pasayat - Full Document

State Of U.P. vs Sukhbasi And Ors. on 10 May, 1985

(See Hukam Singh v. State of Rajasthan AIR (1977 SC 1063); Eradu and Ors. v. State of Hyderabad (AIR 1956 SC 316); Earabhadrappa v. State of Karnataka (AIR 1983 SC 446); State of U.P. v. Sukhbasi and Ors. (AIR 1985 SC 1224); Balwinder Singh v. State of Punjab (AIR 1987 SC 350); Ashok Kumar Chatterjee v. State of M.P. (AIR 1989 SC 1890). The circumstances from which an inference as to the guilt of the accused is drawn have to be proved beyond reasonable doubt and have to be shown to be closely connected with the principal fact sought to be inferred from those circumstances.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 302 - A P Sen - Full Document

Balwinder Singh Alias Dalbir Singh vs State Of Punjab on 26 November, 1986

(See Hukam Singh v. State of Rajasthan AIR (1977 SC 1063); Eradu and Ors. v. State of Hyderabad (AIR 1956 SC 316); Earabhadrappa v. State of Karnataka (AIR 1983 SC 446); State of U.P. v. Sukhbasi and Ors. (AIR 1985 SC 1224); Balwinder Singh v. State of Punjab (AIR 1987 SC 350); Ashok Kumar Chatterjee v. State of M.P. (AIR 1989 SC 1890). The circumstances from which an inference as to the guilt of the accused is drawn have to be proved beyond reasonable doubt and have to be shown to be closely connected with the principal fact sought to be inferred from those circumstances.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 138 - A P Sen - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next