Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.33 seconds)The Specific Relief Act, 1963
P.K. Banerjee vs L.J. Simonds And Anr. on 9 July, 1946
13. Judged by the above principles, the present application, in my view, must fail. The question whether rights under a contract can be the subject of a mandamus was considered in 'P.K. Banerjee v. L.J. Simonds', A. I. R. (34) 1947 Cal. 307. Gentle, J. on a review of the authorities, held that a (mandamus would not issue to enforce a contract. In this connection the learned Judge quoted the following observation of Patterson, J. in Ex parte, Pering (1836) 4 Ad. & El. 949 at p. 950: "We cannot grant a mandamus to a public Board and order them to carry a contract into effect." The learned Judge also cited 'Commr.
Section 4 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay ... vs The Bombay Trust Corporation, Limited on 26 November, 1929
of Income Tax Bombay Presidency & Aden v. Bombay Trust Corporation Ltd.', 63 I. A. 408 in which their Lordships of the Judicial Committee observed as follows:
1