Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.17 seconds)
Jincy Mathew,M.S.Mathew vs Dr.G.V.Kalaichelvi,G.V.K.Hospital on 26 May, 2015 cites

V. Kishan Rao vs Nikhil Super Speciality Hospital & Anr on 8 March, 2010

13.     It is pertinent to note that there is no medical expert's evidence or opinion on record to decide whether there is negligence on the part of the opposite parties as alleged in the complaint and therefore we have to decide the points considering the other available evidence on record and in this regard, we place reliance on the following decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of V. Kishan Rao - Vs - Nikhil Super Specialty Hospital & Anr.  reported in III - (2010) - CPJ-I-(SC), where it is held as follows; -
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 350 - Full Document

Smt. Savita Garg vs The Director, National Heart Institute on 12 October, 2004

24.            It is contended by the 2nd opposite party that hospital is not liable for negligence of doctors, whereas it is held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the following case that the hospital is also liable for the negligence of the doctors.    Savita Garg - Vs - The Director, National Heart Institute, reported in IV (2004) CPJ 40 (SC) wherein it is held as follows:
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 257 - A K Mathur - Full Document

Nizam'S Institute Of Medical Sciences vs Prasanth S.Dhananka & Ors on 14 May, 2009

Nizam Institute of Medical Sciences - Vs - Prasanth S. Dhananka and Others reported in 2009 - INDLAW SC 1047 wherein it is held that               "in a case involving medical negligence, once the initial burden has been discharged by the complainant, by making out of a case of negligence on the part of the hospital or the doctors concerned, the onus then shifts on to the hospital or to the attending doctors and it is for the hospital to satisfy the court that there was no lack of care or diligence".
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 565 - Full Document
1