Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.26 seconds)Bondar Singh & Ors vs Nihal Singh & Ors on 4 March, 2003
Moreover, it appears that the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court made in Bondar Singh's case (cited supra) was not cited before the learned Judge.
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
Section 17 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Durai @ Subrayan vs Anandan on 25 November, 2009
12. Further, this Court, in the decision reported in 2010 (1) MWN (Civil) 534 (Durai @ Subrayan Vs. Anandan), while considering the very same issue in respect of a suit for permanent injunction, has followed the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in Bondar Singh's case (cited supra) and observed in paragraphs 10 and 16 as follows:
Nagammal vs Valliammal on 24 March, 2007
16. The other decision relied on by the learned counsel for the respondents, reported in 2007 (3) CTC 633 (Nagammal Vs. Valliammal) is also not relevant for the present case, since the issue involved in that case was as to whether oral sale is valid or not. Considering the fact that the said issue is not the core issue in the present case, as the suit itself is only for injunction, the above decision is also not helping the respondents in any manner.
S.Kaladevi vs V.R.Somasundaram & Ors on 12 April, 2010
In the decision reported in 2010 (3) MWN (Civil) 556 (SC) (S.Kaladevi Vs. V.R.Somasundaram), the Honourable Supreme Court has considered the question of admissibility of an unregistered sale deed in a suit for specific performance of a contract and observed in paragraph 11 as follows: