Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (1.53 seconds)Section 290 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 341 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 448 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Sharad Kumar Sanghi vs Sangita Rane on 10 February, 2015
16. Admittedly, Royal Calcutta Golf Club, the company has not been
added as party to the criminal proceeding though the allegations are
principally leveled against the said company. Hon'ble Apex Court in
SHARDA KUMAR SANGHI VS. SANGITA RANE reported in (2015) 12
SCC 78 Held:-
Aneeta Hada vs M/S Godfather Travels & Tours Pvt.Ltd on 8 May, 2008
"11. In the case at hand as the complainant's initial statement
would reflect, the allegations are against the company, but
the company has not been made arrayed as a party.
Therefore, the allegations have to be restricted to the
Managing Director. As we have noted earlier, allegations are
vague and in fact, principally the allegations are against the
company. There is no specific allegation against the Managing
Director. When a company has not been arrayed as a party,
no proceeding can be initiated against it even where vicarious
liability is fastened on certain statutes. It has been so held by
a three-Judge Bench in Aneeta Hada v. Godfather Travels
and Tours Private Limited6 in the context of Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881.
M.Saravana Porselvi vs A.R. Chandrashekar @ Parthiban & Ors on 27 May, 2008
In M.SARVANA PORSELVI VS. A.R. CHANDRASHEKHAR @
PARTHIBAN & ORS. reported in (2008) 11 SCC 520 Hon'ble Apex
Court held:-