Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.24 seconds)
P.Sundararaj vs The Chairman And on 21 September, 2012 cites

S.B. Bhattacharjee vs S.D. Majumdar & Ors on 15 May, 2007

11.In the present case, after entering the adverse remarks in the petitioner's ACR, the Superintendent of the respondent Corporation has communicated the same to the petitioner by the letter dated 2.1.2002. In response to that, the petitioner has also submitted his representation dated 12.3.2002. Subsequently, when the adverse remarks attained finality, the said representation of the petitioner was considered by the Departmental Promotion Committee. Therefore, the said decision in S.B.BHATTACHARJEE VS. S.D.MAJUDDAR AND OTHERS (2007) 10 SCC 513) will apply to the case of the respondent, but not to the petitioner.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 116 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Pawan N. Chandra vs Rajasthan High Court & Ors on 21 April, 2009

12.In yet another decision in PAWAN N.CHANDRA VS. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT AND ANOTHER (2009) 17 SCC 770), the Apex Court while dealing with the case of the Judicial Officers has held that the sweeping adverse remarks made in the annual confidential report of the candidate for particular year, casting doubt on his integrity and impartially and capacity to work cannot be treated as justified since the same was primarily based on the complaints made, whose bail applications were rejected by the said officer.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 8 - Full Document
1