Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.25 seconds)Section 2 in THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, 1972 [Entire Act]
The Amending Act, 1897
Birla Institute Of Technology vs The State Of Jharkhand on 7 March, 2019
4.4 Learned counsel for respondents submits that it has
been categorically stated by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court that
the definition of word 'employee' includes 'Teachers'. The
judgment of the High Court relies upon the decision of
Hon'ble Apex Court in Birla Institute of Technology Vs.
State of Jharkhand, (2019) 15 SCC 586. He submits that
there is no rule supporting payment of gratuity to contractual
Digitally signed by Sunita Dutt
Sunita
DN: C=IN, O=Personal, T=8895, OID.2.5.4.65=
1f757d2a40f14493a01379dd12b26c68, Phone=
f725f69527d0bd5de6796dc2b9018c93ad3f1f51d1ed688
256e5ff8c529bbda4, PostalCode=110089, S=Delhi,
SERIALNUMBER=
2bdd79be8aca23c53c876d55428617a4c8cc90ccfe14b2
Dutt
2f74ffb78936ff8f7b, CN=Sunita Dutt
Reason: your signing reason here
Location: your signing location here
Date: 2025.09.12 17:45:50+05'30'
Foxit PDF Reader Version: 2023.2.0
7 OA No.224/2023
Doctors employed with the Respondents. The payment of
gratuity will come from the public exchequer. Without any
statutory provision, such money cannot be paid to the
applicant.
Section 2 in The Factories Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Janardan Sharma vs Gnct Of Delhi on 14 July, 2023
4.2 Learned counsel for respondents submits that facts of
Janardan Sharma (supra) are distinctly different from the
facts of present case.
1