Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.52 seconds)Section 14 in The National Security Act, 1980 [Entire Act]
The National Security Act, 1980
Section 8 in The National Security Act, 1980 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in The Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 [Entire Act]
Sat Pal vs State Of Punjab And Others on 10 November, 1981
The nature of the power of revocation conferred by statute on the Central Government Under Section 11 of the COFEPOSA Act which in terms is similar to Section 14 of the National Security Act, was explained by this court in Sat Pal v. State of Punjab (supra) in the following words :
State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Zavad Zama Khan on 4 May, 1984
We must also add that this is not a case of repeated representations to the Central Government as was the case in Slate of U.P. v. Zavad Zama Khan 1984 AIR SC 1094. In that case, it was held that where an earlier representation to the Central Government had been properly disposed of, the fact that the second representation to the Central Government was not so disposed of would not entitle the detenu to be released. The appeal is, therefore, allowed and the appellant is directed to be set at liberty forthwith.
Sabir Ahmed vs Union Of India And Ors on 18 April, 1980
In view of the wholly unexplained and unduly long delay in the disposal of the representations by the Central Government, the further detention of the appellant must be held illegal and he must be set at liberty in the light of the judgments of this court in Sabir Ahmed v. Union of India and Ors. 1980(3) ACR 738 Khatoon Begum v. Union of India 1981 AIR SC 1077 and Sat Pal v. State of Punjab 1981 AIR SC 2230.
1