Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (1.51 seconds)Section 4 in Assam State Acquisition of Zamindaries Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Assam State Acquisition of Zamindaries Act, 1951
Section 3 in Assam (Temporarily Settled Areas) Tenancy Act 1971 [Entire Act]
Section 96 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in Assam (Temporarily Settled Areas) Tenancy Act 1971 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in Assam State Acquisition of Zamindaries Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
Md. Hesabuddin And Ors. vs Md. Hesaruddin And Ors. on 12 May, 1983
In support of his
submission, Mr. Mahanta has referred to a decision of Hon‟ble Supreme
Court in Md. Hesabuddin & Ors. v. Md. Hesaruddin & Ors.,
reported in MANU/GH/0010/1984.
Sri Ananta Prasad Sahu @ Sri Ananta Lal ... vs Sri Gopal Sahu @ Sri Golao Lal Sahu on 24 September, 2019
10.2. Mr. Islam, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 has rightly
pointed this out and the decision referred by him in Mrs. Sarzina
Begum (supra) and in Ananta Prasad Sahu (supra) also strengthen
his submission and as such, the substantial question of law in Issue
No.(2) has to be answered in negative and accordingly, the same stands
answered.
Ramesh Hiranand Kundanmal vs Municipal Corporation Of Greater ... on 4 March, 1992
10.3. That, regarding the submission of Mr. Mahanta, the learned Senior
Counsel for the appellants‟/defendants‟, I find that the law relating to
joinder and non-joinder of necessary parties is well settled in catena of
decisions of Hon‟ble Supreme Court. Basically two tests are to be satisfied
for determining the question as to who is a necessary party. Reference
in this context can be made to decision of Hon‟ble Supreme Court in
Ramesh Kundanmal vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater
Bombay reported in (1992)2 SCC 524. In the said case, wherein, in
Paragraph 6, Hon‟ble Supreme Court has observed thus:-