Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (1.00 seconds)

Ayinapurapu Venkata Lakshman Kumar vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 3 March, 2020

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that the contents of the complaint would not attract the ingredients of section 509 IPC or section 354 IPC. He has also placed reliance on the statements made by LW1 to LW6. All the witnesses are hear say witnesses and they are not direct witnesses and also the ingredients in the complaint or statements of LWs would not attract the ingredients of section 509 IPC. To support his contention he relied on two judgments of this Court reported in between Ayinapurapu Venkata Lakshman Kumar vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh1 wherein this Court has observed that the intention to outrage the modesty of a woman or knowledge that any such act that would be committed by him against a woman would outrage the modesty of a woman and thereby using criminal force or assault against the woman, are the predominant requirements and essential ingredients that are required to be established to constitute an offence punishable under section 354 IPC.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - C M Roy - Full Document
1