Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.62 seconds)

Ptc India Financial Services Ltd. vs Mr. Venkateshwarlu Kari on 12 May, 2022

In PTC (Supra), the Supreme Court has observed that courts would not lightly grant injunction against the sale of pledged security by pawnee on the allegation of non-compliance of Section 176. However, the court has further observed that injunction under Section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, may be warranted if compensation is not the adequate remedy against the invasion of the rights of enjoyment of property by a person. Since Section 38 is guided by the provisions of Chapter II of Specific Relief Act (hereafter, 'SRA'), the Court has further referred to Section 10 of SRA, where the courts are mandated to enforce specific performance of contract subject to Section 11, 14 and 16 of SRA. Section 16 states that specific performance of contract cannot be enforced in favour of a person who fails to prove that he has performed or has always been ready and willing to perform the essential terms of the contract which are to be performed by him.
Supreme Court of India Cites 90 - Cited by 11 - S Khanna - Full Document
1   2 Next