Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.21 seconds)The Army Act, 1950
Article 33 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of Tamil Nadu vs Mahi Traders & Ors. Etc. Etc on 3 February, 1989
In State of Tamil Nadu v. Mahi Traders (supra) relying on Deshbandhu Gupta's case and decision of the Supreme Court in Vargis v. Union of India, AIR 1981 SC 1922 it was held that a contemporaneous exposition by the Administrative authorities is a very useful and relevant guide to the interpretation of expression used in a statute. It was further observed that such interpretation should be shown to be clearly wrong before it is overturned. The A-I warrant in this case is issued in the year 1963 and is holding field for over 28 years now. It is based on the i interpretation that a general empowerment under Section 109 of the Army Act is possible. There is no reason to upset this interpretation now after so many years.