Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.24 seconds)

The Excise ... vs K.B.N. Visweshwara Rao & Ors on 22 August, 1996

In the said judgments, the Division Bench as well as the Full Bench, following the judgment of the Supreme Court in Excise Superintendent Malkapatnam, Krishna District v. K.B.N.Visweshvara Rao and others, (1996) 6 SCC 216 : 1997-1-LLJ-567, held that the sponsorship through employment office can be a source and not an exclusive source and the Appointing Authorities are empowered to invite applications through Paper Publication and other modes and if appointments are made by giving opportunity to all the candidates to apply, the same is permissible appointments are bound to be approved."
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 264 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

S.R. Murthy vs State Of Karnataka And Ors on 19 August, 1999

Admittedly, the post of Junior Assistant in the fourth respondent school is only one post. If the cadre is consisting of only one post, there is no question of reservation. It is well settled that in a single post cadre, the reservation principle is not applicable. That was also reiterated by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the judgment in S.R.Murthy v. State of Karnataka and others, (1999) 8 SCC 176, wherein the Apex Court, while following a Constitution Bench decision in Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research v. Faculty Association, (1998) 4 SCC 1, has held as follows:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 12 - Full Document
1