Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.09 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973
Chuni Lal Dwarka Nath vs Hartford Fire Insurance Co. Ltd. And ... on 14 November, 1957
In the decision reported as M/s. Chuni Lal Dwarka Nath
Vs. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr. AIR 1958 Punjab
440 it was observed as under:-
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 July, 1984
In support of the said
contention, the counsel relied upon the decision of Supreme
Court reported as Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v State of
Maharashtra AIR 1984 SC 1622. (ii) The second error
pointed out by the learned counsel for the accused was that
the learned Trial Court wrongly came to the conclusion that
the appellant had a lust for the deceased, for there was no
evidence on record which could support said conclusion.
Learned counsel pointed out that none of the family
members of the deceased deposed that the appellant had a
lust for the deceased. On the contrary, Anil Garg PW-2 and
Varun Garg PW-3, the father and brother of the deceased
respectively, deposed that the appellant used to treat the
deceased like his own daughter.
1