Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.27 seconds)

Md. Allauddin Khan vs The State Of Bihar on 15 April, 2019

In a recent judgment passed on 15.04.2019 in Criminal Appeal No.675 of 2019 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.1151 of 2018, Mohd. Allauddin Khan v. State of Bihar and others, 2019 (6) SCC 107, the Apex Court has held that the High Court had no jurisdiction to appreciate the evidences of the proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. because where there are contradictions or the inconsistencies in the statements of the witnesses, is essentially an issue relating to appreciation of evidences and the same can be gone into by the Judicial Magistrate during trial, when the entire evidence is adduced by the parties. The same view has also been reiterated in judgment dated 31.07.2019 passed by Apex Court in Criminal Appeal No.1082 of 2019, arising out of SLP (Crl.)
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 1013 - A M Sapre - Full Document

State vs Shiv Poojan on 2 July, 2010

Heard Sri Prerm Shankar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Pawan Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A. for State of U.P. Applicant has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with a prayer to quash the entire criminal proceeding including the charge sheet dated 14.12.2018 in Case No. 610 of 2019 (State vs. Shiv Poojan Tiwary) arising out of Case Crime No.385 of 2018, under Sections 406, 409 IPC, Police Station- Handia, District- Prayagraj.
Allahabad High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 10 - P Krishna - Full Document
1