Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.29 seconds)

Kalyan Kumar Gogoi vs Ashutosh Agnihotri & Anr on 18 January, 2011

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Section- 39 (2) of the Act and Section- 100 (1) (d) (iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 on the questions relating to non-compliance of provisions materially affecting the result of the election are parimateria provisions. So far as breach or non-compliance of Constitution of India or the statutory provisions are concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner relies on the case of Mangani Lal Mandal v. Bishnu Deo Bhandari, (2012) 3 SCC 314, Kalyan Kumar Gogoi v. Ashutosh Agnihotri and another, (2011) 2 SCC 532 and other similar decisions on the points, which I do not feel inclined to repeat in order to avoid multiplication of citations on similar points in the body of the Judgment.
Supreme Court of India Cites 22 - Cited by 136 - J M Panchal - Full Document

Mangani Lal Mandal vs Bishnu Deo Bhandari on 1 February, 2012

The words "result of the election, in so far as it concerns a returned candidate", are absent in the Grama Panchayat Act and the Election Rules. It is a matter of common sense and also settled law that a petitioner is required to plead the facts constituting the very ground / grounds to declare election null and void. Here, in this case, the election of the present petitioner has been declared null and void under Section - 39 (1) (e) of the Act. The decisions cited by learned counsel for the petitioner in the cases of Mangani Lal Mandal and Kalyan Kumar Gogoi (supra) are related to Section- 100 (1) (d) (iv) of the Representation of the People Act, which is altogether a different ground to declare an election null and void in the said Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 59 - R M Lodha - Full Document
1   2 Next