Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.27 seconds)Section 33 in The Delhi Excise Act, 2009 [Entire Act]
Section 38 in The Delhi Excise Act, 2009 [Entire Act]
Roop Chand & Anr. Etc. vs State Of Haryana . on 4 April, 2014
13. Reliance is also placed upon the judgment passed by Hon'ble
High Court of Delhi in Anoop Joshi vs. State 1999 (2) CC Cases 314
(DHC) and by Hon'ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Roop
Chand vs. State of Haryana 1999 (1) Crl. 69.
Section 207 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 294 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Surender @ Dheeraj vs State on 27 February, 2018
In
Surender @ Dheeraj v. State 2018 SCC OnLine Del 7506, it was
observed by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi:
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Kehar Singh & Ors vs State (Delhi Admn.) on 3 August, 1988
In Kehar Singh v. State (1988) 3 SCC 609 : AIR
1988 SC 1883 one of the accused, Balbir Singh,
was arrested at the bus stand at Najafgarh, which
was a public place but there were no independent
public witnesses to the arrest. It was argued by the
FIR No.808/2015, PS OIA, State v. Lala Ram Page 7 of 10
State that there was no such requirement in the Cr
PC. Repelling this contention, the Supreme Court
observed:
Anoop Kumar Joshi vs The State Of Delhi on 12 January, 2017
13. Reliance is also placed upon the judgment passed by Hon'ble
High Court of Delhi in Anoop Joshi vs. State 1999 (2) CC Cases 314
(DHC) and by Hon'ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Roop
Chand vs. State of Haryana 1999 (1) Crl. 69.
1