Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.29 seconds)The Indian Stamp Act, 1899
Section 40 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Section 26 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
M/S Virtual Soft Systems Ltd vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-I on 6 February, 2007
It is necessary to
understand the scope and ambit of an act and its retrospective operation as
detailed in the case of Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit Vs. Doctor
Manu (2023 INSC 539), wherein 4 principles have been laid down by
placing reliance on CIT v. Podar Cement Pvt. Ltd. (1997)226 ITR 625 (SC);
Allied Motors Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (1997)224 ITR 677(SC); Bihta Cooperative
Development Cane Marketing Union Ltd. v. Bank of Bihar AIR 1967 SC
389; Virtual Soft Systems Ltd. v. CIT, (2007) 9 SCC 665; Union of India v.
Martin Lottery Agencies Ltd. (2009) 12 SCC 209, as under:-
Section 23 in The Registration Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Commissioner Of Income-Tax Bombay Etc vs Podar Cement Pvt. Ltd. Etc on 27 May, 1997
It is necessary to
understand the scope and ambit of an act and its retrospective operation as
detailed in the case of Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit Vs. Doctor
Manu (2023 INSC 539), wherein 4 principles have been laid down by
placing reliance on CIT v. Podar Cement Pvt. Ltd. (1997)226 ITR 625 (SC);
Allied Motors Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (1997)224 ITR 677(SC); Bihta Cooperative
Development Cane Marketing Union Ltd. v. Bank of Bihar AIR 1967 SC
389; Virtual Soft Systems Ltd. v. CIT, (2007) 9 SCC 665; Union of India v.
Martin Lottery Agencies Ltd. (2009) 12 SCC 209, as under:-
Allied Motors Pvt. Ltd. vs . Cit (1997) 139 Ctr (Sc) 364, on 28 January, 2014
It is necessary to
understand the scope and ambit of an act and its retrospective operation as
detailed in the case of Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit Vs. Doctor
Manu (2023 INSC 539), wherein 4 principles have been laid down by
placing reliance on CIT v. Podar Cement Pvt. Ltd. (1997)226 ITR 625 (SC);
Allied Motors Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (1997)224 ITR 677(SC); Bihta Cooperative
Development Cane Marketing Union Ltd. v. Bank of Bihar AIR 1967 SC
389; Virtual Soft Systems Ltd. v. CIT, (2007) 9 SCC 665; Union of India v.
Martin Lottery Agencies Ltd. (2009) 12 SCC 209, as under:-
Bihta Co-Operative Development Cane ... vs The Bank Of Bihar & Ors on 12 October, 1966
It is necessary to
understand the scope and ambit of an act and its retrospective operation as
detailed in the case of Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit Vs. Doctor
Manu (2023 INSC 539), wherein 4 principles have been laid down by
placing reliance on CIT v. Podar Cement Pvt. Ltd. (1997)226 ITR 625 (SC);
Allied Motors Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (1997)224 ITR 677(SC); Bihta Cooperative
Development Cane Marketing Union Ltd. v. Bank of Bihar AIR 1967 SC
389; Virtual Soft Systems Ltd. v. CIT, (2007) 9 SCC 665; Union of India v.
Martin Lottery Agencies Ltd. (2009) 12 SCC 209, as under:-
Union Of India & Ors vs M/S Martin Lottery Agencies Ltd on 5 May, 2009
It is necessary to
understand the scope and ambit of an act and its retrospective operation as
detailed in the case of Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit Vs. Doctor
Manu (2023 INSC 539), wherein 4 principles have been laid down by
placing reliance on CIT v. Podar Cement Pvt. Ltd. (1997)226 ITR 625 (SC);
Allied Motors Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (1997)224 ITR 677(SC); Bihta Cooperative
Development Cane Marketing Union Ltd. v. Bank of Bihar AIR 1967 SC
389; Virtual Soft Systems Ltd. v. CIT, (2007) 9 SCC 665; Union of India v.
Martin Lottery Agencies Ltd. (2009) 12 SCC 209, as under:-